Documents → #80
Closing Address by Counsel for Victory Fire Engineering Limited (English only)
Document 80 of 243 · 19 pages · 19 images
final arguments by counsel for Victory Fire Engineering Limited
Summary
Summary in 繁體中文
Key points
- Victory Fire was RFSIC for annual inspections, not renovation works.
- China Status was RFSIC for renovation works at Wang Fuk Court.
- ISS Eastpoint Properties managed Wang Fuk Court during the incident.
- Victory Fire argues no duty to notify FSD of FAS shutdown.
- FSD Circular Letter No.1/2021 outlines SDN requirements for FSI shutdowns.
- Legislative amendments proposed to enhance fire safety management.
How the Terms of Reference appear in this document
Discussion of Victory Fire's duties under FSD Circular Letter No.1/2021, including the use of SDN for notifying FSD about fire alarm system shutdowns in November 2025.
Clarification that Victory Fire was the RFSIC for annual inspections and rectifications, but not for renovation works, which were handled by China Status Development and Engineering Company Limited.
Analysis of regulatory requirements for RFSICs, including the interpretation of FSD Circular Letter No.1/2021 and the SDN template.
In the news
This document connects to these themes in the news coverage analysis (News & Coverage).
Full document (19 pages) — click to expand
Text extraction produced no content (scanned document) — see the extracted images above or the original PDF.
Related documents
- #13 1stWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only)same party: China Status Development and Engineering Company Limited
- #42 2ndWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only)same party: China Status Development and Engineering Company Limited
- #68 4thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)same party: Victory Fire Engineering Limited
- #69 4thWitness Statement of Mr YIU Men Yeung (English only)same party: Fire Services Department (FSD)