ToR Perspectives → ToR2
ToR2: Fire Service Installations & Equipment
Whether fire-service installations existed and worked, and who supervised them
Estimated work: 548 hours across 117 documents · 5,066 pages · see the Work & Effort ledger
How this report was made. Methodology: every document was read and tagged by a large language model (gpt-4.1-mini via the HKBU GenAI gateway) against the Committee's seven Terms of Reference; key points, themes and parties were extracted per document. For each ToR, the relevant documents were grouped into themes and the narratives below were drafted from the documents' own summaries and key points. Inline citations [n] link to this site's HTML rendering of each document (which links to the original PDF on the government site). This page is an editorial aid for journalists and the public; it is not a finding or publication of the Committee, and the original documents remain authoritative.
Overview
The documents reveal significant issues with the fire service installations (FSI) and equipment at Wang Fuk Court, including malfunctioning sprinkler and fire alarm systems, delayed activations, inadequate maintenance, and supervision gaps. These failures contributed to the rapid fire spread and evacuation difficulties during the incident.
Report sections by theme
Each section synthesises the relevant documents; inline citations link to each document's page.
Malfunction and Failure of Fire Service Installations
Multiple witness statements and expert reports indicate that the sprinkler system at Wang Fuk Court was either non-functional or had incomplete coverage, which accelerated the fire spread. Delays in fire alarm activation and failures in emergency lighting further compromised early detection and evacuation efforts. These malfunctions were consistently noted across witness testimonies and hearing transcripts, highlighting systemic equipment failures during the fire [2][41][51][60][61][62][63][64][66][69][71][72][73][75][79][82].
Expert analyses corroborate these findings, emphasizing that compartmentation failures and incomplete sprinkler coverage significantly worsened the fire’s impact. The fire alarm system’s delayed activation and partial malfunctions were repeatedly discussed in inquiry hearings, underscoring critical lapses in fire service installations that hindered timely emergency response [41][52][60][61][62][63][64][66][69][71][72][73][75][79][82].
Cited documents (16)
- 1stWitness Statement of Mr FOK Chun Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Expert Report by Professor Asif Sohail USMANI and Professor JIANG Liming, Fire Engineering Experts appointed by the Independent Committee (English onl · original PDF ↗
- Presentation Slides by Mr YIU Men Yeung (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 1 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 10 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 13 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 15 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 15 July 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 16 July 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 19 March 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 20 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 20 March 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 22 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 23 April 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 25 June 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
- Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 31 March 2026 (Draft) · original PDF ↗
Supervision and Maintenance Gaps in Fire Service Installations
Statements from fire department officials and inquiry witnesses reveal significant supervision gaps and maintenance lapses concerning the fire service installations at Wang Fuk Court. Missing and damaged fire pump room logbooks and lack of verification of fire alarm efficiency during inspections point to systemic oversight failures. These gaps allowed critical equipment to remain unchecked or improperly maintained, contributing to the fire’s severity [4][19][31][36][46][59].
Further, contractors responsible for fire system shutdowns and maintenance were scrutinized for procedural and administrative shortcomings. Disputes over contractor registration status and roles in fire service installation works highlight deficiencies in regulatory compliance and accountability. These issues underscore the need for improved supervision and maintenance protocols to ensure fire safety equipment reliability [7][20][32][38].
Cited documents (10)
- 1stWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 2ndWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 4thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Closing Address by Counsel for the Committee (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Opening Address by Counsel for ISS EastPoint Properties Limited (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Synopsis of Closing Address by Counsel for the Relevant Bureaux and Departments of the Government (Chinese only) · original PDF ↗
- 1stWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 2ndWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 5thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Closing Address by Counsel for Victory Fire Engineering Limited (English only) · original PDF ↗
Fire Alarm and Emergency Communication Failures
Several witness statements and hearing transcripts detail delays and failures in fire alarm activation and emergency communication during the Wang Fuk Court fire. These delays impeded timely evacuation and emergency response, exacerbating the fire’s impact. Emergency lighting failures and communication gaps further complicated evacuation efforts, as noted by multiple witnesses [8][10][22][29][85].
The inquiry documents emphasize that these communication failures were not isolated incidents but part of broader systemic issues with fire service installations and emergency preparedness. The delayed fire alarm activations and malfunctioning emergency systems were recurrent themes in testimonies and expert analyses, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in the building’s fire safety infrastructure [22][29][85].
Cited documents (4)
Contractor Roles and Regulatory Compliance in Fire Service Installations
The inquiry documents reveal complexities regarding the roles of contractors responsible for fire service installations at Wang Fuk Court. China Status was contracted for fire system shutdowns and renovation works but was not a registered Fire Service Installation Contractor (RFSIC) for all works, while Prestige Construction & Fire Engineering held registration but was not involved in certain tasks. These distinctions raised questions about regulatory compliance and proper notification procedures [7][20][32][38].
Legal submissions and closing addresses further scrutinized contractor accountability and adherence to statutory requirements. The Competition Commission also highlighted risks of anti-competitive practices in procurement processes related to fire service installations, calling for greater transparency and oversight to prevent market collusion and ensure quality maintenance [32][38][39].
Cited documents (5)
- 1stWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 2ndWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only) · original PDF ↗
- 5thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Closing Address by Counsel for Victory Fire Engineering Limited (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Closing Address by Representative of Competition Commission (English only) · original PDF ↗
Recommendations for Fire Service Installation Improvements
Fire engineering experts and various stakeholders provided detailed recommendations to improve fire service installations at Wang Fuk Court. Emphasis was placed on enhancing sprinkler system coverage, upgrading fire detection and alarm systems, and strengthening maintenance protocols. These recommendations aim to address the identified equipment failures and supervision gaps to prevent recurrence of similar incidents [54][57][56].
The Competition Commission also recommended stricter oversight on tendering processes for fire equipment to ensure transparency and fairness, thereby improving the quality and reliability of fire service installations. Resident groups and government bodies echoed calls for regulatory improvements and better enforcement to enhance overall fire safety standards [55][56][57].
Cited documents (4)
- Recommendations by Professor Asif Sohail USMANI and Professor JIANG Liming, Fire Engineering Experts appointed by the Independent Committee (English o · original PDF ↗
- Recommendations on improvement measures by the Government concerning Terms of Reference (1) and (2) of Independent Committee (English only) · original PDF ↗
- Recommendations on improvement measures by nine Wang Fuk Court residents concerning Terms of Reference (1) and (2) of Independent Committee (Chinese o · original PDF ↗
- Recommendations on improvement measures by Competition Commission concerning Terms of Reference (2) of Independent Committee (English only) · original PDF ↗
All documents in this ToR (106 (was 154))
Expand each document for its summary, key points and links.
#6 1stWitness Statement of Mr CHUNG Kit Man (Chinese only)
witness testimonyfire circumstancesinvestigation detailspersonal account
- Witness statement by Mr Chung Kit Man in Chinese
- Details personal identification and contact information
- Provides firsthand account related to Wang Fuk Court fire
- Includes observations on fire circumstances and response
#7 1stWitness Statement of Mr FOK Chun Ming (English only)
fire spreadsprinkler failureevacuation difficultiesemergency response
- Witness present at Wang Fuk Court during fire
- Observed fire spread on multiple floors rapidly
- Noted absence of active sprinkler system
- Reported delayed fire service response
#8 1stWitness Statement of Mr HO Kin Yip (English only)
fire timelineevacuationfire safety equipmentcommunication
- Witness Ho Kin Yip provides first-hand account of fire events
- Describes timeline and initial fire detection
- Details evacuation procedures followed
- Notes condition and functionality of fire safety equipment
#9 1stWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)
fire spreadFSI compliancesupervision gaprenovation safety
- Mr. KEUNG Sai Ming is Assistant Director of FSD since March 2024.
- Statement addresses fire safety protocols and FSI compliance at Wang Fuk Court.
- FSD oversees licensing, certification, and fire hazard abatement in Hong Kong.
- Details inspections and FSI shutdown notifications during Wang Fuk Court renovation.
#11 1stWitness Statement of Mr KU Siu Ping (English only)
fire detectionevacuation challengesemergency responsecommunication systems
- Witness Mr Ku Siu Ping provides detailed fire event account
- Describes initial fire detection and response actions
- Notes issues with fire alarm and communication systems
- Mentions building evacuation procedures and challenges
#12 1stWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Man Chung (Chinese only)
fire spreadfire responsebuilding safetywitness testimony
- Witness Leung Man Chung provides first statement on Wang Fuk Court fire
- Statement submitted to Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court fire
- Details personal observations and timeline of fire incident
- Describes fire spread and response actions
#13 1stWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only)
fire service shutdownscommunication methodscontractual practicesrenovation coordination
- Mr. Leung Ping Kay is a director of China Status.
- China Status contracted with PC&E for Wang Fuk Court fire system shutdowns.
- SDNs submitted to FSD for 8 buildings' FH/HR systems in Wang Fuk Court.
- WhatsApp group used for project communications between China Status and PC&E.
#14 1stWitness Statement of Mr LI Man Pong (English only)
fire alarm delayfire hydrant failureemergency communicationevacuation difficulties
- Witness Li Man Pong provides detailed fire timeline
- Observed delayed fire alarm activation
- Noted malfunctioning fire hydrant system
- Reported inadequate fire safety training
#15 1stWitness Statement of Mr TANG Wing Wah (English only)
fire outbreak timelineevacuation proceduresfire equipment statussupervision and coordination
- Witness is Mr Tang Wing Wah, providing first-hand account
- Describes fire outbreak timeline and initial response
- Details on fire alarm activation and evacuation procedures
- Observations on fire service equipment functionality
#16 1stWitness Statement of Mr TUNG Wing Kei (English only)
fire detectionevacuation challengesfire alarm systemcommunication
- Witness Tung Wing Kei provides first-hand account of fire events
- Describes initial fire detection and response actions
- Details on fire alarm system performance
- Observations on evacuation procedures and challenges
#17 1stWitness Statement of Mr WONG Cheung Hing (English only)
fire outbreakevacuation processfire service equipmentcommunication gaps
- Witness Mr Wong Cheung Hing provides first-hand fire account
- Describes fire outbreak and initial response actions
- Details on fire alarm activation and evacuation process
- Mentions condition of fire service installations during fire
#18 1stWitness Statement of Mr WONG Pak Shing (Chinese only)
building maintenancefire safetywitness testimonycompany responsibility
- Wong Pak Shing represents Zhipang Industrial Ltd
- Statement dated March 9, 2026
- Related to Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
- Details personal observations and company role
#19 1stWitness Statement of Mr WONG Sze Lut, Sunny (English only)
fire spreadevacuationfire safety equipmentcommunication
- Witness account of fire outbreak and initial response
- Describes fire detection and alarm activation timeline
- Details evacuation procedures and challenges faced
- Notes condition and functionality of fire safety equipment
#20 1stWitness Statement of Mr YEUNG Yan Kin, Andy (English only)
fire incident timelinefire safety equipmentbuilding maintenanceemergency response
- Witness statement by Mr Yeung Yan Kin, Andy
- Details on fire incident timeline and observations
- Descriptions of fire safety equipment status
- Comments on building maintenance and repairs
#24 1stWitness Statement of Ms CHAI Nga Man (English only)
fire originevacuationfire safety equipmentemergency response
- Witness Ms CHAI Nga Man present during Wang Fuk Court fire
- Observed fire origin and initial spread details
- Described evacuation procedures and challenges
- Noted condition of fire safety equipment
#25 1stWitness Statement of Ms CHENG Tsz Ying (Chinese only)
witness testimonycompany representationfire inquiry
- Ms Cheng Tsz Ying submitted first witness statement
- Represents Zhi Bang Xing Ye Co. Ltd.
- Statement dated March 9, 2026
- Related to Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
#35 2ndWitness Statement of Mr CHUNG Kit Man (Chinese only)
fire spreadfire service documentationinspection practicesresponsibility disputes
- Chung Kit Man submitted a second witness statement on April 3, 2026.
- Fire occurred at Wang Fuk Court, Tai Po, on November 26, 2025.
- Chung discussed fire alarm system and inspection issues with Lam Man Yan.
- Chung provided a link to standard fire service forms during the call.
#37 2ndWitness Statement of Mr HO Kin Yip (English only)
fire spreadfire service responseevacuation proceduresequipment maintenance
- Mr Ho Kin Yip provided second witness statement
- Statement includes detailed fire timeline observations
- Describes fire spread and smoke conditions
- Comments on fire service response timing
#38 2ndWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)
fire spreadsupervision gapbuilding maintenance
- Four FS pump room logbooks are missing, including severely damaged blocks.
- Two available logbooks provide no explanation for unlocked FS pump rooms.
- Police custody holds master logbook and four individual block logbooks.
- FS pump rooms in Blocks A and B were unlocked despite logbook entries.
#42 2ndWitness Statement of Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only)
fire service procedurescontractor rolesadministrative processescollaboration between RFSICs
- Mr. Leung Ping Kay supplements his 1st Witness Statement.
- China Status is a Registered Fire Service Installation Contractor (RFSIC).
- China Status does not undertake water tank-related works.
- Mr. Leung is responsible for SDN applications and site inspections.
#44 2ndWitness Statement of Mr TANG Wing Wah (English only)
fire detectionemergency responsemaintenance recordscommunication delays
- Witness details fire detection system status during incident
- Describes response actions taken by building management
- Notes delays in fire alarm activation and communication
- Highlights maintenance records of fire safety equipment
#45 2ndWitness Statement of Mr TUNG Wing Kei (English only)
fire alarm delayemergency lighting failurecommunication gapsequipment maintenance
- Witness details fire detection system status during incident
- Reported delays in fire alarm activation
- Noted issues with emergency lighting functionality
- Described communication gaps among fire response teams
#47 2ndWitness Statement of Mr WONG Pak Shing (Chinese only)
fire circumstancesbuilding conditionswitness testimony
- Wong Pak Shing submitted second witness statement
- Represents Cheung Kong Industries Limited
- Statement dated March 30, 2026
- Related to Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
#49 2ndWitness Statement of Mr YEUNG Yan Kin, Andy (English only)
fire incident timelinefire safety equipmentemergency responseevacuation challenges
- Mr Yeung Yan Kin, Andy provided second witness statement
- Statement focuses on fire incident details at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and response actions during fire
- Highlights issues with fire safety equipment functionality
#54 2ndWitness Statement of Ms CHENG Tsz Ying (Chinese only)
witness testimonycompany representationfire inquiry process
- Ms Cheng Tsz Ying submitted second witness statement
- Statement dated March 30, 2026
- Represents Zhipang Industrial Co. Ltd.
- Related to Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
#56 2ndWitness Statement of Ms LAM Wing Sze, Emma (English only)
fire detectionalarm responseevacuationcommunication
- Emma Lam provided second witness statement
- Statement focuses on fire circumstances at Wang Fuk Court
- Details on fire detection and alarm response
- Mentions evacuation procedures and challenges
#59 3rdWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)
fire detectionevacuation processfire service responsebuilding safety
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and fire detection response
- Details on fire alarm activation and evacuation
- Observations on fire service arrival and actions
#63 3rdWitness Statement of Mr TANG Wing Wah (English only)
fire detectionemergency responseequipment failureevacuation
- Mr Tang Wing Wah witnessed fire outbreak at Wang Fuk Court
- Described initial fire detection and alarm response
- Noted delays in fire service arrival
- Observed malfunctioning fire safety equipment
#65 3rdWitness Statement of Mr WONG Sze Lut, Sunny (English only)
fire ignitionevacuation difficultiesfire alarm delayequipment maintenance
- Witness observed fire ignition and initial spread
- Noted delays in fire alarm activation
- Described evacuation challenges faced by residents
- Highlighted issues with emergency lighting
#66 3rdWitness Statement of Mr YIU Men Yeung (English only)
fire spreadfire safety equipmentevacuationbuilding maintenance
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Observed timeline and fire spread details
- Noted condition of fire safety equipment
- Described evacuation procedures followed
#68 4thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)
fire spreadsupervision gapsystemic issuesrecommendations
- FSD approved 16 FSI shutdown extensions, followed up after 4 months.
- FSD inspections at Wang Fuk Court lacked verification of fire alarm efficiency.
- Victory Fire Engineering and China Status suspected of misconduct or negligence.
- Annual inspections misunderstood to require latest 'Code of Practice' compliance.
#70 5thWitness Statement of Mr KEUNG Sai Ming (English only)
fire service compliancenotification systemstatutory accountabilitycontractor roles
- Mr. KEUNG Sai Ming addresses inaccuracies in Mr. LEUNG Ping-kay's statement.
- Prestige Construction & Fire Engineering is a registered RFSIC; PC&E is not.
- Prestige Construction did not perform FSI-related works at Wang Fuk Court.
- FSD Circular Letter No. 1/2021 outlines strict SDN notification requirements.
#74 Closing Address by Counsel for ISS EastPoint Properties Limited (English only)
liability disputefire safety compliancemaintenance recordscausation debate
- ISS EastPoint denies liability for fire spread
- Argues compliance with fire safety regulations
- Challenges adequacy of fire service installations
- Highlights maintenance records and inspections
#75 Closing Address by Counsel for Mr LEUNG Ping Kay (English only)
legal defenseevidence scrutinyaccountabilityinvestigation fairness
- Defense emphasizes lack of direct causation by Mr Leung
- Challenges reliability of prosecution evidence
- Highlights procedural fairness and legal standards
- Argues no negligence proven against Mr Leung
#76 Closing Address by Counsel for nine Wang Fuk Court residents (Chinese only)
fire safety failuresbuilding maintenanceaccountabilityinvestigation transparency
- Nine Wang Fuk Court residents jointly submit closing address
- Residents highlight fire safety system failures
- Call for accountability of building management
- Emphasis on inadequate maintenance and supervision
#77 Closing Address by Counsel for the Committee (English only)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapbuilding maintenance
- Fire caused by multiple safety system failures
- Inadequate maintenance of fire service installations
- Lapses in supervision and enforcement identified
- Building renovation works contributed to fire spread
#78 Closing Address by Counsel for the Relevant Bureaux and Departments of the Government (English only)
fire safety compliancegovernment accountabilityinter-department coordinationbuilding maintenance
- Government bureaus deny negligence in fire prevention
- Emphasize compliance with existing fire safety regulations
- Highlight coordination among departments during fire response
- Argue adequacy of building maintenance and inspections
#80 Closing Address by Counsel for Victory Fire Engineering Limited (English only)
fire service rolesregulatory frameworknotification dutieslegislative gaps
- Victory Fire was RFSIC for annual inspections, not renovation works.
- China Status was RFSIC for renovation works at Wang Fuk Court.
- ISS Eastpoint Properties managed Wang Fuk Court during the incident.
- Victory Fire argues no duty to notify FSD of FAS shutdown.
#81 Closing Address by Representative of Competition Commission (English only)
tender collusionprocurement transparencymarket oversightanti-competitive practices
- Competition Commission highlights anti-competitive practices risks
- Emphasizes need for fair tendering in building maintenance
- Warns against collusion and bid-rigging in contracts
- Calls for stronger oversight to prevent market abuses
#83 Directions of the Chairman of the Independent Committee made at the hearing on 8 May 2026
inquiry proceduresevidence managementtransparencyconfidentiality
- Chairman issued procedural directions at 8 May 2026 hearing
- Focus on evidence submission deadlines and witness testimonies
- Clarification on scope of inquiry topics and document disclosures
- Emphasis on transparency and timely cooperation from parties
#84 Expert Report by Professor Asif Sohail USMANI and Professor JIANG Liming, Fire Engineering Experts appointed by the Independent Committee (English onl
fire spreadsprinkler failuresmoke controlbuilding fire resistance
- Fire spread accelerated by compartmentation failures
- Sprinkler system coverage was incomplete and ineffective
- Smoke control systems did not perform as designed
- Fire resistance of key structural elements was inadequate
#85 Final Investigation Report of the Inter-departmental Fire Investigation Task Force (Appendix A-27 is the Expert Report by Professor YUEN Kwok Kit, Ric
fire originfire spreadfire safety installationsbuilding design
- Expert report by Prof. Yuen Kwok Kit on fire engineering
- Detailed analysis of fire origin and spread
- Assessment of fire safety installations effectiveness
- Evaluation of building materials and design impact
#113 Interim Investigation Report of the Inter-departmental Fire Investigation Task Force (English only)
fire originfire spreadfire service equipmentsupervision gap
- Fire originated in a residential unit at Wang Fuk Court
- Rapid fire spread due to combustible interior materials
- Fire service installations partially functional but insufficient
- Delayed evacuation contributed to casualties
#116 List of Involved Parties (as at 23 April 2026)
involved partiesroles and responsibilitiesaccountabilityfire safety management
- Comprehensive list of parties involved in Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
- Includes government departments and contractors
- Details roles and responsibilities of each party
- Covers fire safety and building maintenance entities
#127 Opening Address by Counsel for Hop On Management Company Limited (Chinese only)
building maintenancesupervision rolesfire preventionmanagement responsibility
- Hop On Management defends its fire safety management role
- Emphasizes compliance with building maintenance regulations
- Challenges allegations of negligence in fire prevention
- Highlights limitations in control over residents' actions
#128 Opening Address by Counsel for ISS EastPoint Properties Limited (English only)
supervision gapbuilding maintenanceroles and responsibilitiesfire safety compliance
- ISS EastPoint Properties Limited represented by counsel
- Opening address outlines company’s position on fire incident
- Emphasis on compliance with fire safety regulations
- Denial of negligence in building maintenance
#129 Opening Address by Counsel for Relevant Bureaux and Departments of the Government
government responsefire safety regulationsinterdepartmental coordinationbuilding maintenance
- Government bureaus emphasize coordinated response to fire
- Acknowledgement of existing fire safety regulations
- Commitment to transparent inquiry process
- Highlight roles of various departments in fire management
#130 Opening Address by Counsel for the Committee
fire investigationsupervision gapsystemic issueslegal adequacy
- Committee established to investigate Wang Fuk Court fire
- Focus on causes, fire service installations, and maintenance
- Examination of supervision and roles of involved parties
- Assessment of systemic issues including collusion risks
#131 Opening Address by Counsel for Urban Renewal Authority (English only)
building maintenancesupervision gapfire service coordinationsystemic improvements
- URA emphasizes commitment to fire safety in redevelopment projects
- Acknowledges challenges in building maintenance and renovation
- Highlights coordination with fire services and regulatory bodies
- Stresses importance of clear roles and responsibilities
#137 Presentation Slides by Mr LAM Kin Kwan (English only)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Deputy Leader of IFITF presented key fire investigation findings
- Analysis of fire spread and contributing factors
- Assessment of fire service installations effectiveness
- Identification of building maintenance issues
#138 Presentation Slides by Mr YIU Men Yeung (English only)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Fire spread rapidly due to inadequate compartmentation
- Sprinkler system was non-functional during the fire
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspections
- Building management lacked clear fire safety roles
#139 Presentation Slides by Professor Asif Sohail USMANI and Professor JIANG Liming (English only)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding designevacuation safety
- Fire spread influenced by building design and ventilation
- Sprinkler system coverage was incomplete in Wang Fuk Court
- Fire resistance of materials was below recommended standards
- Evacuation routes were partially obstructed during fire
#140 Presentation Slides by Professor YUEN Kwok Kit, Richard (English only)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding designsupervision gap
- Detailed fire engineering analysis of Wang Fuk Court fire
- Identified fire spread mechanisms and contributing factors
- Assessment of fire service installations and their performance
- Evaluation of building design and materials in fire context
#142 Recommendations by Professor Asif Sohail USMANI and Professor JIANG Liming, Fire Engineering Experts appointed by the Independent Committee (English o
fire safety improvementssprinkler system enhancementfire detection upgradesregulatory recommendations
- Fire engineering experts provide detailed safety recommendations
- Emphasis on improving fire detection and alarm systems
- Recommendations include enhanced sprinkler system coverage
- Focus on building design to prevent fire spread
#143 Recommendations on improvement measures by Competition Commission concerning Terms of Reference (2) of Independent Committee (English only)
tender collusionfire service installationsprocurement transparencysupervision gap
- Competition Commission recommends stricter oversight on fire equipment tenders
- Calls for transparency in procurement processes
- Suggests measures to prevent bid-rigging and collusion
- Emphasizes need for regular audits of fire service installations
#144 Recommendations on improvement measures by nine Wang Fuk Court residents concerning Terms of Reference (1) and (2) of Independent Committee (Chinese o
fire causesfire service installationsresident recommendationsfire safety improvements
- Nine Wang Fuk Court residents submitted improvement recommendations
- Recommendations focus on Terms of Reference 1 and 2
- Emphasis on fire causes and fire service installations
- Residents highlight need for better fire detection systems
#145 Recommendations on improvement measures by the Government concerning Terms of Reference (1) and (2) of Independent Committee (English only)
fire service installationsregulatory improvementmaintenance protocolspublic safety awareness
- Government proposes enhanced fire safety regulations
- Improvement of fire service installations recommended
- Stricter maintenance protocols for fire equipment
- Upgrading sprinkler and alarm systems suggested
#159 Response of the 12th Management Committee of the Incorporated Owners of Wang Fuk Court for the term from 6 September 2024 to 6 January 2026 in relatio
building maintenancerenovation worksresident communicationfire safety
- 12th Management Committee term from Sept 2024 to Jan 2026
- Response addresses Wang Fuk Court and major repair works
- Committee outlines maintenance and renovation efforts
- Highlights communication with residents and stakeholders
#161 Synopsis of Closing Address by Counsel for the Relevant Bureaux and Departments of the Government (Chinese only)
supervision gapfire service installationsbuilding maintenanceregulatory adequacy
- Government bureaux and departments present closing address summary
- Focus on roles and responsibilities in fire prevention
- Emphasis on existing fire safety regulations compliance
- Discussion on adequacy of fire service installations
#162 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 1 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapmaintenance issues
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Fire service installations partially malfunctioned during incident
- Maintenance records showed delayed repairs on key equipment
- Supervisory roles during fire response were unclear
#163 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 10 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Fire service installations reportedly malfunctioned during fire
- Maintenance records for Wang Fuk Court were incomplete
- Supervisory roles during fire response were unclear
#164 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 13 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenanceemergency response
- Witnesses testified on fire origin and spread timeline
- Discussions on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspections
- Conflicting accounts on emergency response effectiveness
#165 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 15 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses testified on fire origin and spread
- Discussion on malfunction of fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records for Wang Fuk Court reviewed
- Responsibility of building management questioned
#166 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 15 July 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuremaintenance lapsesresponse coordination
- Witnesses detailed fire outbreak timeline
- Fire alarms activated late during incident
- Sprinkler system malfunction reported
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspections
#167 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 16 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenanceemergency response
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussions on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Debate over adequacy of building maintenance records
- Conflicting testimonies on emergency response effectiveness
#168 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 16 July 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapevacuation delay
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Discussion on malfunction of fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records for fire safety equipment reviewed
- Roles of building management and fire services scrutinized
#169 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 17 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussion on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records for fire safety equipment were incomplete
- Responsibility for building safety oversight debated
#170 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 17 July 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussion on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinkler systems
- Maintenance records for fire safety equipment were incomplete
- Responsibility of property management company questioned
#171 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 19 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapemergency response
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Issues raised about malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Delays in fire brigade arrival noted
- Maintenance records for fire equipment were incomplete
#172 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 2 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadfire service equipmentbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses detailed fire outbreak timeline and initial response
- Fire service equipment functionality discussed
- Maintenance records of Wang Fuk Court reviewed
- Roles of building management and fire services examined
#173 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 20 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussion on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspection intervals
- Responsibility of building management questioned
#174 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 20 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Discussion on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspections
- Responsibility of building management questioned
#176 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 22 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenanceemergency response
- Witness testimonies on fire origin and spread
- Discussion on fire alarm and sprinkler activation
- Examination of building maintenance records
- Clarification of roles of fire safety officers
#177 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 22 June 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapemergency response
- Witness testimonies detail fire outbreak timeline
- Discussions on fire alarm and sprinkler activation
- Maintenance records of fire safety equipment reviewed
- Roles of building management and fire services examined
#178 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 23 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses testified on fire origin and spread timeline
- Discussions on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records for fire safety equipment reviewed
- Responsibility of building management questioned
#179 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 24 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussion on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records for fire safety equipment were incomplete
- Responsibility of building management in safety oversight debated
#180 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 24 June 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses detailed timeline of fire outbreak and response
- Fire service installations' performance discussed
- Maintenance records of Wang Fuk Court scrutinized
- Roles of building management and fire services examined
#181 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 24 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failuresupervision gapemergency response
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussion on functionality of fire alarms and sprinklers
- Maintenance records of fire safety equipment reviewed
- Roles of building management and fire services examined
#182 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 25 June 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussions on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinklers
- Debate over adequacy of building maintenance records
- Conflicting testimonies on emergency response times
#183 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 26 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenanceemergency response
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak timeline
- Discussions on malfunctioning fire alarms and sprinkler systems
- Debate over adequacy of building maintenance records
- Clarifications on roles of property management and fire services
#186 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 30 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision roles
- Witness testimonies on fire origin and spread
- Discussions on fire safety equipment functionality
- Examination of building maintenance records
- Clarifications on roles of fire safety officers
#187 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 31 March 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadsprinkler failurebuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses detailed fire outbreak timeline and initial response
- Discussions on fire alarm system functionality and failures
- Testimonies on maintenance records and renovation works
- Clarifications on roles of fire services and building management
#188 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 6 May 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witnesses provided detailed accounts of fire outbreak and response
- Discussions on adequacy of fire service installations
- Evidence on building maintenance and renovation works presented
- Roles and responsibilities of involved parties examined
#190 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 8 April 2026 (Draft)
fire spreadfire service responsebuilding maintenancesupervision roles
- Witness testimonies detail fire outbreak timeline
- Fire service response times and actions reviewed
- Building maintenance records examined
- Issues with fire alarm activation discussed
#191 Transcript of Evidential Hearing held on 8 May 2026 (Draft)
fire alarm delayequipment malfunctionmaintenance lapsesemergency communication
- Witnesses described delayed fire alarm activation
- Fire service installations partially malfunctioned
- Maintenance records showed irregular inspections
- Communication breakdown among emergency responders
#192 Transcript of the Direction Conference held on 5 February 2026
inquiry procedurecase managementevidence handlingscheduling
- Direction conference held on 5 February 2026
- Discussed procedural arrangements for inquiry
- Parties agreed on timetable and document exchange
- Clarified scope and issues for investigation
#193 Witness Statement of Ir Dr TO Chi Wing (English only)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Ir Dr TO Chi Wing provided expert engineering testimony
- Detailed analysis of fire spread mechanisms
- Assessment of fire service installations effectiveness
- Evaluation of building maintenance impact on fire
#195 Witness Statement of Mr CHAN Derek Armstrong (English only)
fire timelineevacuationfire detectionbuilding safety
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and fire detection response
- Details on fire alarm activation and evacuation
- Observations on fire service arrival and actions
#200 Witness Statement of Mr HUI Kin On (English only)
fire spreadinitial responsescaffolding fire
- Mr. Hui Kin On was the initial Incident Commander at Wang Fuk Court fire.
- Fire involved scaffolding on the exterior of Wang Cheong House with explosions.
- Fire spread vertically along scaffolding, blocking rear exit with burning debris.
- Initial firefighting involved deploying two water jets to control lower scaffolding fire.
#201 Witness Statement of Mr LAI Ho Fai, Edmund (English only)
fire timelinealarm responseevacuationfire service actions
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and fire detection response
- Details on fire alarm activation and evacuation
- Observations on fire service arrival and actions
#203 Witness Statement of Mr LAM Man Yan (Chinese only)
fire circumstancesbuilding maintenancesupervision rolesfire service installations
- Lam Man Yan represents Cheung Kong Property Holdings Ltd.
- Statement submitted on March 3, 2026
- Details on fire circumstances at Wang Fuk Court
- Insights on building maintenance and renovation works
#205 Witness Statement of Mr LAW Kwok Shui (Chinese only)
fire circumstancesbuilding maintenancewitness testimonyfire response
- Witness statement by Mr. Law Kwok Shui for independent committee
- Represents Cheung Kong Property Holdings Limited
- Statement dated 3 March 2026
- Related to Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
#208 Witness Statement of Mr LEE Shing Foo (Chinese only)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenanceroles and responsibilities
- 李承富為置邦興業有限公司代表作證
- 火災發生於大埔宏福苑
- 證詞涵蓋火災經過及相關設備狀況
- 描述火警初期反應及救援情況
#214 Witness Statement of Mr PANG Yuk Lung, Michael (English only)
fire spreadbuilding maintenancesupervision gapfire response
- Witness statement by Mr Pang Yuk Lung, Michael
- Details on fire incident at Wang Fuk Court
- Observations on fire spread and response
- Comments on building maintenance and safety measures
#215 Witness Statement of Mr SIU Tsz Ho (Chinese only)
fire spreadrescue operationsfirefighter actionshazardous conditions
- Mr. Siu Tsz Ho is a firefighter stationed in Sha Tin.
- Responded to a Level 1 fire at Wang Fuk Court on Nov 26, 2025.
- Assigned to assist with water hose setup and rescue operations.
- Encountered severe conditions with falling burning scaffolding materials.
#217 Witness Statement of Mr TONG Hing Lun (Chinese only)
witness testimonyfire circumstancesfire responseinvestigation evidence
- Witness statement by Mr Tong Hing Lun for Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
- Statement includes personal identification and residence details
- Details pertain to the fire incident in November 2025
- Contains observations relevant to fire circumstances and response
#219 Witness Statement of Mr TSUI Moon Come (Chinese only)
fire spreadfire service responsebuilding maintenancesupervision
- Witness statement by Mr Tsui Moon Come on Wang Fuk Court fire
- Details personal observations during the fire incident
- Describes timeline and fire spread conditions
- Mentions fire service response and equipment status
#221 Witness Statement of Mr WONG Kin Wa (Chinese only)
fire spreadfire system shutdownmaintenance oversightemergency response
- Witness Wong Kin Wa employed by Hong Tai Fire Engineering Co.
- Fire pump and alarm systems were shut off during maintenance.
- Fire pump pipes disconnected, affecting water supply to rooftop tanks.
- Maintenance works included emergency lighting and fire hose reel replacements.
#222 Witness Statement of Mr WONG King Man (English only)
fire spreadfire service installationsbuilding maintenancesupervision gap
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and fire detection response
- Details on fire service equipment performance
- Observations on building evacuation process
#226 Witness Statement of Mr YIM Choi Wah, Alex (English only)
fire detectionemergency responsefire safety equipmentevacuation
- Witness Alex Yim details fire incident observations
- Describes timeline and initial fire detection
- Notes response actions by building management
- Mentions fire safety equipment status
#229 Witness Statement of Mr YUEN Tsz Lok, Murphy (English only)
fire timelineevacuationfire service responsebuilding safety
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes timeline and fire detection response
- Details on evacuation procedures followed
- Observations on fire service arrival and actions
#230 Witness Statement of Mr YUNG Kam Hung, Michael (English only)
fire spreadfire service installationsevacuation challengessupervision gap
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes fire detection and alarm response timeline
- Details on evacuation procedures and challenges
- Observations on fire service installations' performance
#233 Witness Statement of Ms CHEUNG Yuk Ching, Karen (English only)
evacuationfire detectionemergency responsebuilding safety
- Witness account of fire events at Wang Fuk Court
- Describes evacuation procedures and challenges
- Details on fire detection and alarm response
- Observations on building safety features
#235 Witness Statement of Ms CHUNG Sui Ha (Chinese only)
witness testimonyfire incidentcompany representationinvestigation process
- Witness statement by Ms Chung Sui Ha for Zhihang Industrial Ltd.
- Statement dated March 9, 2026, for Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry.
- Provides personal address and background information.
- Details involvement or observations related to the fire incident.
#240 Witness Statement of Ms LO Hiu Kei (Chinese only)
fire spreadbuilding maintenancefire alarm failurerenovation impact
- Witness's mother died in Wang Fuk Court fire on 2025-11-26.
- Mother reported smoke and fire but no fire alarm sounded.
- Building renovations blocked windows, reducing ventilation and increasing fire risk.
- Scaffolding outside windows stored items, adding to fire hazards.
#241 Witness Statement of Ms LOK Sin Ying (Chinese only)
building maintenancesupervision rolesfire causesrenovation works
- Witness Lok Sin Ying represents Zhipang Industrial Ltd.
- Statement dated March 3, 2026
- Related to Tai Po Wang Fuk Court fire inquiry
- Details on building maintenance and renovation works