Documents → #79
Closing Address by Counsel for Urban Renewal Authority (Chinese only)
Document 79 of 243 · 9 pages · 0 images
Closing address by counsel for Urban Renewal Authority
Summary
The Urban Renewal Authority (URA), in its closing address, denies responsibility for the cause of the Tai Po Wang Fuk Court fire and emphasizes its compliance with building regulations, maintenance, and inspection standards. The URA refutes allegations of negligence in renovation works, highlights improvements in tendering processes to address bid-rigging concerns, and supports recommendations for enhanced fire safety measures. It calls for clearer delineation of supervisory roles and reaffirms its commitment to improving building maintenance practices.
Summary in English
The document is the closing address delivered by counsel representing the Urban Renewal Authority (URA) before an independent committee investigating the Tai Po Wang Fuk Court fire. It outlines the URA’s legal arguments and key positions regarding the incident and the Authority’s role. The address aims to clarify the URA’s responsibilities and responses in the context of the fire inquiry.
Key points
- URA denies responsibility for fire cause
- Emphasizes compliance with building regulations
- Highlights maintenance and inspection records
- Refutes claims of negligence in renovation works
- Calls for clear delineation of supervisory roles
- Supports recommendations for improved fire safety
How the Terms of Reference appear in this document
ToR1 Causes & Circumstances of Fire
URA denies responsibility for fire cause, arguing compliance with regulations
ToR3 Building Maintenance & Renovation Works
Highlights maintenance and inspection records demonstrating proper upkeep
ToR4 Supervision, Roles & Responsibilities
Emphasizes URA's supervisory role and adherence to statutory duties
ToR7 Recommendations & Improvement Measures
Suggests improvements based on URA's experience and compliance practices
In the news
This document connects to these themes in the news coverage analysis (News & Coverage).
Full document (9 pages) — click to expand
Text extraction produced no content (scanned document) — see the extracted images above or the original PDF.
Related documents
- #131 Opening Address by Counsel for Urban Renewal Authority (English only)procedural pair
- #7 1stWitness Statement of Mr FOK Chun Ming (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #8 1stWitness Statement of Mr HO Kin Yip (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #11 1stWitness Statement of Mr KU Siu Ping (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #14 1stWitness Statement of Mr LI Man Pong (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #15 1stWitness Statement of Mr TANG Wing Wah (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #21 1stWitness Statement of Mr YIU Men Yeung (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire
- #24 1stWitness Statement of Ms CHAI Nga Man (English only)same party: Independent Committee on Wang Fuk Court Fire