部分中文翻譯或有不準確之處，本網站正持續檢視及修正中。如發現錯誤，歡迎電郵
simonwanghkteacher@gmail.com 告知。
所有內容請以官方網站的原始文件為準。
地圖與文件 → #79
Closing Address by Counsel for Urban Renewal Authority (Chinese only)
文件 79 / 243 · 9 頁 · 0 張圖片 · English version
另一語言的摘要
# 市區重建局代表大律師的總結陳詞 **Source**: https://www.ic-wangfukcourtfire.gov.hk/pdf/docs/Closing-Address-URA.pdf **Local PDF**: pdfs/Closing-Address-URA.pdf **Pages**: 9 **Images extracted**: 0 **Converted**: 2026-08-16T09:43:18.322168 ## Content 就大埔宏福苑火災成立的獨立委員會 ____________________________________ 市區重建局之總結陳詞 ____________________________________ A...
此為掃描文件，未能抽取可搜尋文字；頁面圖像及下方原始 PDF 載有內容。
另一語言的摘要（English）
The document is the closing address delivered by counsel representing the Urban Renewal Authority (URA) before an independent committee investigating the Tai Po Wang Fuk Court fire. It outlines the URA’s legal arguments and key positions regarding the incident and the Authority’s role. The address aims to clarify the URA’s responsibilities and responses in the context of the fire inquiry.
摘要（English）
The Urban Renewal Authority (URA), in its closing address, denies responsibility for the cause of the Tai Po Wang Fuk Court fire and emphasizes its compliance with building regulations, maintenance, and inspection standards. The URA refutes allegations of negligence in renovation works, highlights improvements in tendering processes to address bid-rigging concerns, and supports recommendations for enhanced fire safety measures. It calls for clearer delineation of supervisory roles and reaffirms its commitment to improving building maintenance practices.
要點
- URA denies responsibility for fire cause
- Emphasizes compliance with building regulations
- Highlights maintenance and inspection records
- Refutes claims of negligence in renovation works
- Calls for clear delineation of supervisory roles
- Supports recommendations for improved fire safety
全文（點擊展開）（9 頁）
掃描文件——請參閱原始 PDF。